Investment & budget · Prepared for Eden Women's Health

One relationship, two workstreams — the build, and the books that run on it.

skubbs builds the Plato↔Xero middleware. VaniceAdvisory — our sister company under the same management — keeps the resulting books, GST filings and corporate secretarial work running on top of it. Two specialisms, quoted separately below so each is transparent on its own, but delivered as one coordinated engagement rather than two vendors you have to keep in sync yourself.

2 companies
skubbs (build) + VaniceAdvisory (accounting & corp sec) — sister companies, common management, one point of contact
One-off + ongoing
skubbs is a fixed-scope build billed in two milestones; VaniceAdvisory is a monthly retainer with no lock-in
Up to 50%
of the skubbs build cost potentially offset via Enterprise Singapore's EDG grant (client-applied, not guaranteed — doesn't apply to the accounting retainer)
How this is structured

Two specialisms, one accountable team — not two vendors passing the parcel.

skubbs builds software. VaniceAdvisory does accounting and corporate secretarial work. They're sister companies under common management — not a referral partnership stitched together for this pitch — so both workstreams are coordinated from day one, not integrated after the fact once something breaks between them.

One point of accountability

If a number looks wrong, there's no vendor pointing at the other vendor. The same management owns both sides of the Plato → books handoff, so issues get resolved, not routed.

No re-keying, no format mismatches

VaniceAdvisory's bookkeepers work directly off the canonical data model skubbs builds — not a generic export they have to reshape by hand every month, which is where most of the "communication gap" time actually goes.

Boutique, not templated

VaniceAdvisory sizes its service to a single-specialist practice, not a high-volume compliance mill. Categories, COGS treatment and the OB/GYN revenue split follow how Dr Lim actually runs the clinic — not a generic chart of accounts forced onto your data.

One coordinated timeline

Books cutover and middleware go-live are scheduled together, so there's no gap where the old manual process and the new pipeline have to run side by side just to keep both sides in sync.

Workstream 1 · skubbs — the middleware build (one-off)

A lean Foundation, priced for a single clinic — everything else is optional.

The Foundation build answers all six of your original questions at single-clinic scope: visit, referral and revenue reporting post to Xero fully automated; inventory/COGS reporting comes via a structured manual template you fill in monthly, instead of a live pipeline. Everything below it — full COGS automation, an admin UI, and the AI layer — is optional. Add any of it now or later; nothing in Foundation is thrown away when you do.

Line item
Tag
Investment
Optional add-ons

Tick on what you need — the total updates as you go.

Nothing here is required to answer your original six questions; Foundation already does. The COGS automation upgrade replaces the manual template with a live pipeline. The AI layer adds capability beyond what you originally asked for — and is also what makes this a strong fit for EDG funding (see below).

Optional — maintenance & support retainer

Not included in the investment above, and independent of which options you add. A simple, low-commitment way to keep the system running once it's live — start with this, add more later if you need it.

  • 2-week free warranty: any bug that doesn't match the agreed scope gets fixed at no cost in the two weeks after final delivery.
  • Bundled retainer after that: maintenance and support work — Plato/Xero API changes, minor rule tweaks, monitoring, and general questions — bundled into 2 man-days/month, billed monthly at S$850/month.
  • No lock-in: pause or cancel any month; unused days don't carry a penalty either way. Scales up if you end up needing more hands.
Not eligible under EDG — the grant covers the one-off development cost, not an ongoing retainer. Priced at the same day rate as everything above (S$425/day), just in a smaller, recurring bundle.
Workstream 2 · VaniceAdvisory — accounting & corporate secretarial (ongoing)

The books, GST and statutory filings for all three entities, priced monthly.

Scoped for your three-entity structure — OpCo (the trading clinic), Newco (the property/lease entity) and Holdco (the group holding entity) — at your stated transaction volume (<100/month) and current GST-registered status. Priced on its own so it's fully transparent, but since VaniceAdvisory sits under the same management as skubbs, running both side by side means one team already fluent in your data model handles the books — no handoff, no re-briefing a second vendor.

Since 2017
VaniceAdvisory has run as a Singapore corporate advisory & compliance practice for years — not a firm assembled for this pitch
300+ clients
Founders and SMEs currently advised across corporate secretarial, compliance and bookkeeping engagements
Award-recognised
"Top Business Service & Quality" and "Prestige 100 Singapore," 2025/2026 (Vision Media Group)

This quote sits under VA Vault, VaniceAdvisory's dedicated ACRA compliance, corporate secretarial and bookkeeping arm. The same practice also runs AskVAVA, a free WhatsApp-based AI assistant that flags CPF, GST and AGM deadlines before they're due — available to clients at no extra cost.

Entity & service
Frequency
Amount
OpCo (Medical)
Bookkeeping, GST & tax compliance
Up to 100 transactions/month
  • Bank reconciliation & transaction categorisation, monthly P&L / balance sheet
  • Quarterly GST F5 computation & e-filing
  • Annual corporate tax filing (Form C-S/C) with XBRL
Monthly
S$580/mo
Payroll & CPF processing
Up to 5 pax, billed directly at market rate
Monthly
S$160/mo
Newco (Property)
Bookkeeping & financial statements
Passive/lease income entity
  • Rental income & bank reconciliation, annual financial statements
Annual
S$1,550/yr
Corporate tax filing
Form C-S/C, e-filed
Annual
S$250/yr
Holdco (Passive)
Group consolidation & financial statements
Consolidates OpCo + Newco into one set of group accounts
  • Consolidation of OpCo + Newco accounts into group financial statements
Annual
S$1,750/yr
Corporate tax filing
Form C-S/C, e-filed
Annual
S$200/yr
All entities
Corporate secretarial
3 companies @ S$300 each
Annual
S$900/yr
Total annual outlay
S$13,530/yr (≈ S$1,128/mo blended)

Why group consolidation is priced in, not bolted on

Most compliance-platform providers treat cross-entity consolidation as a paid add-on charged per subsidiary, on top of each entity's own bookkeeping package. We price it as a standard line item for your structure instead — because with three related entities, a consolidated group view isn't optional, it's the report you actually need to run the business.

Figures above assume the transaction volumes and headcount you've shared with us. If actual volume, payroll headcount, or Newco's rental activity differs meaningfully once we're in, we'd flag and re-quote that specific line — not the whole engagement.
Why we deliver faster

We build this the same way we're proposing to automate your reporting: SkubbsMate handles the repetitive part, and a person checks the part that matters.

A project scoped like this typically runs 9–11 weeks with a conventional custom-build agency. Built on our SkubbsMate development platform, we're usually looking at closer to 5–7 weeks — without cutting corners on anything that touches your financial data.

Where SkubbsMate's AI-assisted engineering actually saves time

  • Boilerplate extraction/transformation code, API client scaffolding, and UI screens — the bulk of the raw coding hours
  • First-pass data mapping between Plato's report fields and Xero's chart of accounts
  • Test scaffolding and documentation, generated alongside the code instead of after it

Where we don't cut a single hour

  • Classification rule design (OB/GYN, Procedures vs. Doctor's fees) — this needs your judgment, not just a model's
  • Financial reconciliation logic — COGS and GST handling get manually reviewed line by line before anything posts to Xero
  • Client validation checkpoints at the end of every phase, before the next one starts
The AI-enhanced layer — what it adds

Where artificial intelligence actually earns its place, if you tick it on.

Not "AI" as a buzzword bolted on for the pitch — these are the specific places a model does something a static rules engine can't. None of this is required to answer your six original questions; it's what you'd be paying the extra S$8,075 for, and it's also the piece that makes EDG's "Automation" criteria a strong fit rather than a stretch.

AI-powered invoice extraction

Reads unstructured lab/radiology invoices — the cost data that lives outside Plato entirely — and pulls out structured line items automatically, instead of the manual upload-and-parse step in the Foundation build.

AI-assisted OB/GYN & procedure classification

Trained against your locked classification ruleset once it's stable, with a confidence score on every line and a human-review queue for anything it's not sure about — never a silent guess on financial data.

"Ask your numbers a question" assistant

A natural-language query layer over the canonical data model — e.g. "how did GYN revenue compare to last quarter" — without needing to open a spreadsheet or wait for a report to be built.

Anomaly & variance detection

Automatically flags the kind of thing you currently catch by hand — the refund/MC-visit variance, or a GST-inclusive figure slipping in next to exclusive ones post-March 2026 — before it reaches your bookkeeper.

Note: the Foundation build's vendor-discount matching stays a deterministic reconciliation step, not an AI feature — it doesn't need to be one to work well.

Handled carefully — PDPA and patient data

Patient visit records, procedure classification and referral data are personal — and in this case health-related — data under Singapore's PDPA. If you tick on the AI layer, feeding that into it isn't something to gloss over, so here's how we'd approach it:

  • Data minimisation: classification and matching prompts reference patient/invoice IDs, not names, wherever the workflow allows it — the model only sees what the specific task actually needs.
  • AI provider selection: enterprise-tier providers only, with contractual no-training-on-your-data terms and defined data residency/retention — confirmed and documented before the AI layer goes live, not assumed.
  • Roles under PDPA: we'd operate as your data intermediary, processing on your behalf under a written agreement. Your practice remains the data controller and stays responsible for patient consent and notification — we build to support that obligation, not replace it.
  • Access & retention: full audit trail and access controls on every record the AI layer touches, with a retention/deletion policy agreed during scoping rather than indefinite storage by default.
This isn't a substitute for your own PDPA compliance review or legal advice — happy to work with your compliance advisor on the specifics before this layer is built.
Grant support — Enterprise Development Grant (EDG)

Higher base cost, stronger grant case — here's the actual math.

Enterprise Singapore's EDG is the most relevant scheme for a bespoke build like this — it's project-based (not restricted to a pre-approved vendor list, unlike the Productivity Solutions Grant, which explicitly excludes customised work). The Foundation build could still cite EDG's "system integration" criteria, but the AI-enhanced build is a noticeably stronger case for the "sophisticated software solution" / Automation language the grant is actually looking to fund.

Up to 50%of qualifying project cost, for eligible local SMEs
Base rate confirmed current
Scope
Base cost
If EDG approved
Grant fit
Foundation only
—
—
Possible — weaker case
Your current selection
—
—
Possible — weaker case
The trade-off in plain terms: Foundation on its own is the lower-cost, lower-risk starting point — no grant application needed. Ticking on the AI layer above costs more up front, but is the strongest textual fit for EDG's "Automation" criteria, and if approved, up to 50% of whatever you've selected can come back as reimbursement. Figures update live as you tick options above; both are illustrative and not guaranteed — see the caveats below.
  • What it covers: EDG's "Innovation & Productivity" pillar, Automation sub-category, explicitly names "adoption/development of sophisticated software solutions" and "system integration" — a reasonable textual fit for this project.
  • Who applies: The clinic applies directly via the Business Grants Portal — as the vendor, we can supply the quotation and scope documentation, but we cannot apply on your behalf or manage the grant relationship.
  • Not guaranteed: Approval is discretionary, case-by-case, and disbursed as reimbursement after project completion and audit — typically 8–12 weeks to process. Treat the 50% figure as a planning ceiling, not a committed discount.
  • Eligibility, as far as we could confirm: ≥30% local (Singapore Citizen/PR) shareholding, and standard SME thresholds (group turnover ≤S$100M or ≤200 employees) — worth double-checking directly with Enterprise Singapore or a grant consultant before you commit budget.
  • One thing to watch: Enterprise Singapore has signalled a consolidated "EDGE" grant (merging EDG, PSG and Market Readiness Assistance) targeted for later in 2026. It hadn't launched as of this proposal — terms could shift mid-engagement, so we'd recommend applying under current EDG terms sooner rather than later if this is something you want to pursue.
  • Productivity Solutions Grant (PSG) — not applicable here. PSG is restricted to pre-scoped packages from pre-approved vendors with no customisation permitted, which structurally excludes a bespoke build like this one.
  • Scope: EDG applies to the skubbs middleware build only — it's a one-off development grant, and doesn't extend to VaniceAdvisory's ongoing accounting retainer below.
Commercial terms

Two workstreams, two billing rhythms.

skubbs bills the build in two milestones. VaniceAdvisory bills the accounting retainer monthly, independent of build progress — you can start either one first.

skubbs — middleware build (one-off)

50%

Deposit to start

Due on kickoff, before work begins.

50%

On delivery

Due once the build is delivered and you've had a chance to validate it against real Plato/Xero data.

VaniceAdvisory — accounting & corp sec (ongoing)

Mo.

Billed monthly, in advance

Invoiced ahead of each month; quarterly/annual items (GST, tax filing, corp sec) invoiced when due.

0%

No lock-in

Cancel with 30 days' notice — no penalty, no minimum term.

Let's get the numbers right for you

Want to adjust the scope?

Both quotes above are starting points, not fixed — happy to adjust either one, or both, once we talk through exactly what you need. Since skubbs and VaniceAdvisory sit under the same management, running both together means one team stays accountable for the build and the books, end to end.